[openi18n-im:01187] *Schedule* Internet Intranet Input Method Framework (IIIMF) r12.2
Leon Ho <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.internationalization.input-methods |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, Here is the schedule for r12.2 after re-updating the proposed schedule in IRC meeting: Feature Freeze - Mar 01 API/ABI Freeze - Mar 10 Code Freeze - Apr 22 QA Period - Apr 25-27 Release - Apr 29 All date referring to this freeze time (unless there are other preferences): San Fransisco 06:00 New York 09:00 Pune 07:30 Beijing 22:00 Tokyo 23:00 Brisbane 00:00 (+1day) I hope this will assist on each one of you on this project. Feature freeze is early next week, so let's fire up the feature discussions! Regards, Leon Following is the meeting log--- Online: hideki, jens, tagoh, miura, AlexBanh, ervin, Rob, rogerso, ssriram 13:00 <@llch> while most of the people is here, can we talk about two things - schedule and feature freeze date for r12.2? 13:00 < Hideki> Surely! 13:01 <@llch> in the initial schedule, we were proposing three major releases over 12 months period 13:01 <@llch> so it suppose to be: 13:02 <@llch> Jan-April - release+1 13:02 <@llch> May-Aug - release+2 13:02 <@llch> Sep-Dec - release+3 13:03 <@llch> that will give us three stable version over 1 year period. how do you guys feel - is it too tight? or just right? 13:03 < Hideki> Yup, let's shoot for it. From my end, namespace based file I/O API implementation will have an incompatible updates from current trunk, which I hope it would be final. 13:04 < Hideki> To be in r12.2 13:05 < Hideki> It's just about right, in given your great contribution on managing the releases. 13:06 <@llch> problem for now is we have lost two months from release+1, so I am hoping we can freeze a the feature very soon together (properly quick discussion on mailing list) and i will write it on the feature page for 12.2 13:07 <@llch> and then we will virtually only got 1 1/2 months time for development until QA and release engineering period 13:08 < Hideki> No problem! We can freeze the feature really soon. Probably sooner is better(but I simultaneously :-) want to put namespace I/O API updates :-) 13:09 < Hideki> In your got-feeling, when would be the right line to freeze the feature in given condition? 13:10 <@llch> how about Tuesday, 1st March 9:00EST? 13:11 <@llch> API/ABI freeze will be 10 days after this 13:11 < Hideki> Sounds reasonable to me. 13:11 <@llch> and then code freeze can go as it - 13:11 <@llch> Code Freeze - Apr 22 13:11 <@llch> QA Period - Apr 25-27 13:11 <@llch> Release - Apr 29 13:13 <@llch> how do contributors feel about this? rogerso, ssriram, tagoh, jens, ervin, miura ...? 13:13 < Hideki> Fine with me...actually it is OK to be even earier :-). I was reading feature freeze as API/ABI freeze :-). 13:14 < rogerso> I would be more concerned about packaging releases :D 13:15 < rogerso> shall I only package the stable releases for Debian from now on? 13:15 <@llch> Hideki: how about refering API/ABI freeze as contributor cannot commit anything that break those into svn 13:15 < jens> sounds good to me 13:16 <@llch> rogerso: it is distro/vendor choice :) but if you have stable releases then i suppose you would want to do that :) 13:18 < rogerso> I suppose so 13:18 <@llch> i will resend the schedule again. let's start to locking feature for r12.2