Re: New version to kick around.
"mark" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ipod.ephpod |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000001c319ac$be82ac50$0300a8c0@mark> |
I'm using the new Ephpod 2.70a and encoding mp4 files with nero/aac encoder. I'm trying to transfer songs to Ipod Windows (1.3) version and it will load or play on ipod. Please help?? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of richard Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 4:40 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [ephpod] Re: New version to kick around. I've found that even obvious differences are less obvious in blind testing. ymmv. Based on blind tests around here, telling the difference between lame -aps and original wav is much easier than telling the difference between psytel -normal, nero normal/high and original wav. At 10:12 AM 5/13/2003 -0700, Phil wrote: >No, it wasn't blind testing, but it was fairly obvious that Nero was better >because the same settings (normal or extreme) didn't have distortions like >with Psytel. ------------------------------------------------------ ephPod Mailing List FAQ and HomePage http://www.ephpod.com mailto:[email protected] to susbcribe mailto:[email protected] to unsusbcribe mailto:[email protected] the mailing-list itself ------------------------------------------------------ ephPod Mailing List FAQ and HomePage http://www.ephpod.com mailto:[email protected] to susbcribe mailto:[email protected] to unsusbcribe mailto:[email protected] the mailing-list itself