Re: gtkpod 2.1.0... timeframe?

> Hi all. I'm repeating something I already asked for in IRC channel, but
> no reply there.
>
> I received a bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/631293) querying if
> there is any timeframe when the 2.1 branch (using GTK3) would be
> declared stable. We need to know that to define the switch process
> between the experimental distribution and the unstable one in Debian.
>
> Let me know.
>
> Thanks.
>
> mfv
>

Hi mfv,

Yes I did see your IRC question but have been suffering build servers
falling over at home. They are back up and intending to at least get an
alpha build of the next ubuntu up to see if there are any compilation
issues. Fedora 15 has no problems with 2.1.0.

The reason being is a guy using mageia reported compile errors to do with
drag n drop, using GTK 3.0.11, so I need to first determine whether it is
a general migration issue or something specific to that distro.

As soon as that is solved then I see no reason to start the beta process
for 2.1.0.

Cheers

PGR


-- 
Laws are partly formed for the sake of good men, in order to instruct them
how they may live on friendly terms with one another, and partly for the
sake of those who refuse to be instructed, whose spirit cannot be subdued,
or softened, or hindered from plunging into evil. [The Laws, Plato]

You fiend! Never have I encountered such corrupt and foul-minded
perversity… Have you ever considered a career in the church?
Bishop of Bath and Wells (Blackadder II)

A clear conscience? When did you acquire such luxuries, Bernard? (Sir
Humphrey, Yes Prime Minister)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a 
definitive record of customers, application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c1