Re: Generic Trend or preferred mode of developing plugins
Peter Hansson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC55jYO2uAs25t7k9KvHTpyZMk0wT8P-1xL12y=aQCFWZf-w=w@mail.gmail.com> |
I'm never going back to Ant, never, ever ! I would never dream of doing NB plugin or app development on Ant. Not that Maven is perfect but for plugin development it is quite an excellent choice and Benno's arguments (especially #1) are spot on. I must admit I personally don't bother to contribute to someone else's project if it's Ant based. Peter On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:20 AM, markiewb <[email protected]> wrote: > Hej Thusar, > > I prefer Maven for new plugins. > > 1) It's easier for others to contribute, when put to github, and easy to > use Travis CI this way. > 2) Signing also only a maven plugin - > http://wiki.netbeans.org/DevFaqSignNbm > 3) As long as Maven artifacts for new versions are provided and the > NetBeans Maven Mojo is maintained, I see no problems. > > > Best regards, Benno > ------------------------------ > Från: Tushar Joshi <[email protected]> > Skickat: 06.02.2016 05:38 > Till: [email protected] > Ämne: [nbdev] Generic Trend or preferred mode of developing plugins > > Hi All, > > What is the generic trend of plugin development for NetBeans, do you > prefer creating a Maven based plugin or still working on Ant based plugin > for netbeans. > > I am asking with the consideration that a plugin developer has to > 1) Keep the plugin on Github and may want to use the TravisCI type of > build some day > 2) Have to submit the plugin to the Plugin portal for verification by > signing it > 3) Maintain the plugin for all the upcoming versions of the NetBeans IDE > Platform. > > with regards > Tushar >