Re: Resulting class performance

Oh, you don't store the add. Hmm. May be that it's just too different
from how a Java loop works. Stuff rarely hangs around on the stack
after a branch except for the ternary operator.

On Friday, May 7, 2010, Scott Vachalek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm, yes.  Actually it looks like your loop is broken... on the second iteration there would only be one argument for iadd, no?
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jeremy Cowgar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/7/2010 4:08 PM, Scott Vachalek wrote:
>
> I know.  Just saying, it's still tricky -- for example if the problem is really the iconst/ldc difference it's not really going to make a major difference to fix it, although it will seem like it for your test.
>
>
>
> That took it to 2.6 seconds, but I think the real problem is the compile failed that I posted a minute ago.
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>
>
>

-- 
You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws