Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Resulting class performance

If that were true then the verifier would have blown chunks wouldn't  
it?  It does appear like the count is being maintained in two places  
though: both in slot 0 and on the stack, hence the iinc and iadd?

On May 7, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Scott Vachalek wrote:

> Hmm, yes.  Actually it looks like your loop is broken... on the  
> second iteration there would only be one argument for iadd, no?
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jeremy Cowgar <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
> On 5/7/2010 4:08 PM, Scott Vachalek wrote:
> I know.  Just saying, it's still tricky -- for example if the  
> problem is really the iconst/ldc difference it's not really going to  
> make a major difference to fix it, although it will seem like it for  
> your test.
>
> That took it to 2.6 seconds, but I think the real problem is the  
> compile failed that I posted a minute ago.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing  
> list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>
>
>
> -- 
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing  
> list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws

-- 
You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws