Re: A little suggestion about ASM Project

Benoit Daloze <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 15:01:57 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm
Message-ID <CANLTa0CpkrL8UuJTZHxRbOjoRNz4_sySSkCPzsRM4ohsJmGUaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Just a suggestion: it might be worth trying
https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git which could handle branches better.

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Remi Forax <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> We are in the middle of moving to git !
>
> BTW, here there is a hero that understand svngit in depth,
> our current configuration script is
>   [svn-remote "svn"]
>          url = svn://svn.forge.objectweb.org/svnroot/asm
>          fetch = trunk:refs/remotes/svn/trunk
>          branches = branches/*:refs/remotes/svn/branches/*
>          tags = tags/*:refs/remotes/svn/tags/*
> but the branches of the resulting git repo are all the same :(
>
> The project will still be hosted by OW2 but doing a clone on github and
> accepting contribution from the community will be far easier.
>
> Given that ASM is widely used, all Java EE containers, spring, hibernate,
> jackson, etc,  having a small number of changesets is IMO an indication
> that we have few bugs, no perf regression between versions, etc so it's
> more a good news than a problem.
> Ultimately, the classfile format is only one chapter of the VM spec, so
> the diff between one version to another (every 3 years!) is often reduced
> to less than 5 pages.
>
> cheers,
> Rémi
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *De: *"ucorn" <[email protected]>
> *À: *"asm" <[email protected]>
> *Envoyé: *Samedi 22 Avril 2017 11:07:16
> *Objet: *[asm] A little suggestion about ASM Project
>
> Hi, leaders:
>     I am working an APM product, the BCI function of java agent depends on
> both ASM and Javassist partially .
>     My test reveals that asm is more efficient and stable than Javassist
> and better compatibility with JDK 8,9
>     So I am deciding whether to migrate the source codes in javassist to
> ASM.
>     However when I check the svn of ASM, I found it was very slow to
> download the source code.
>     And the iteration of source codes is very slow, only a few changesets
> per year.
>     I am wondering whether the project is maintained actively.
>     ASM is well designed with excellent implementation, I love it greatly.
>     And would u plan to migrate the project to github  and push the
> project more actively?
>
>
>
>
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>
>
>
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>
>


-- 
You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws