Re: A little suggestion about ASM Project
Benoit Daloze <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Apr 2017 15:01:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANLTa0CpkrL8UuJTZHxRbOjoRNz4_sySSkCPzsRM4ohsJmGUaQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Just a suggestion: it might be worth trying https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git which could handle branches better. On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Remi Forax <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > We are in the middle of moving to git ! > > BTW, here there is a hero that understand svngit in depth, > our current configuration script is > [svn-remote "svn"] > url = svn://svn.forge.objectweb.org/svnroot/asm > fetch = trunk:refs/remotes/svn/trunk > branches = branches/*:refs/remotes/svn/branches/* > tags = tags/*:refs/remotes/svn/tags/* > but the branches of the resulting git repo are all the same :( > > The project will still be hosted by OW2 but doing a clone on github and > accepting contribution from the community will be far easier. > > Given that ASM is widely used, all Java EE containers, spring, hibernate, > jackson, etc, having a small number of changesets is IMO an indication > that we have few bugs, no perf regression between versions, etc so it's > more a good news than a problem. > Ultimately, the classfile format is only one chapter of the VM spec, so > the diff between one version to another (every 3 years!) is often reduced > to less than 5 pages. > > cheers, > Rémi > > > ------------------------------ > > *De: *"ucorn" <[email protected]> > *À: *"asm" <[email protected]> > *Envoyé: *Samedi 22 Avril 2017 11:07:16 > *Objet: *[asm] A little suggestion about ASM Project > > Hi, leaders: > I am working an APM product, the BCI function of java agent depends on > both ASM and Javassist partially . > My test reveals that asm is more efficient and stable than Javassist > and better compatibility with JDK 8,9 > So I am deciding whether to migrate the source codes in javassist to > ASM. > However when I check the svn of ASM, I found it was very slow to > download the source code. > And the iteration of source codes is very slow, only a few changesets > per year. > I am wondering whether the project is maintained actively. > ASM is well designed with excellent implementation, I love it greatly. > And would u plan to migrate the project to github and push the > project more actively? > > > > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. > To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help > OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws > > > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. > To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help > OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws > > -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws