Re: spice-apps/spice-sandbox??

Peter Donald wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:50, Mauro Talevi wrote:
>  
> Sounds good. Though we may want to convert spice-lib into stable libs and put 
> developing ones (meta* & xinvoke) into spice-sandbox ?

fine by me.


> Not sure at the moment. I was planning on putting documentation and maybe a 
> container in there eventually. Got side-tracked.
> 
> Maybe we could merge into one uber CVS directory. Something along the lines of
> 
> spice/site
> spice/lib
> spice/sandbox
> spice/apps
> spice/X
> 
> ?

yep - much cleaner - intuitive and expandable - cvs outlay.

Are you going to request a CVS restructuring to SF.net or are you going 
to copy the existing files to the new structure (removing the old ones)?

First case we get to keep cvs history (but people have to checkout a 
fresh work dir),
second case has more smooth transition.

I've asked SF.net to restructure before and they are quite fast and 
efficient.
If we are going down this route better now than later.

Cheers, Mauro






-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com