Re: OfB.biz: Why I Don't Use "Linux"
Daniel Cassidy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 28 August 2003 2:25 am, Timothy R. Butler wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > But should 'Hurd' be called 'Hurd', 'GNU' or 'GNU/Hurd'? > > Well, commonly the Hurd, when used as a complete OS, is referred to as > GNU/Hurd. However, I suspect the technically correct answer would be GNU > since it is part of the overall GNU System not an addition. I'd imagine > GNU/Hurd will be prefered though so as not to confuse anyone with GNU/Linux > (for instance, one argument I read against RMS was ranting that RMS had > gone so far as to call Linux simply GNU. In reality, he was referring to > the GNU system seperate from a particular kernel, but many people might > assume "GNU" means GNU/Linux anyway.) > > Like GNU/Linux, I suspect this depends on what you are referring to: > > The Hurd: use this when referring to the kernel alone. > GNU/Hurd: use this when referring to the entire OS. > GNU: use this when referring to the GNU system independent of the kernel. > > Likewise... > Linux: use this when referring to the kernel alone. > GNU/Linux: use this when referring to the entire OS. > GNU: use this when referring to the GNU system independent of the kernel. Meh. I was being mildly sarcastic :P However, i'd be inclined to call it 'GNU', since that's what the system was supposed to be called from the outset. -- Dan. DISCLAIMER: Please do not take my statements wildly out of context and attribute to me opinions which I do not hold. Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected] http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.