Re: Neil's Newsforge article

Rob Kaper <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.cafe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday September 10 2003 3:52 am, Andreas Pour wrote:
> Seems you missed some elementary logic, dear Watons.  If all KDE developers
> stop developing, there is no KDE.  Ergo, the more KDE developers stop
> developing, the worse it is for KDE.  Ergo, something which affects a
> "disproportionate amount of developers in a certain geopolitical region" is
> strongly correlated to "what affects KDE directly".

Ergo, the bias is justified. Just don't say it's not there and I thank you for 
not denying it, which so many people have tried to do. The needs of the group 
outweigh the needs of the individual, no problem - for me anyway. I didn't 
play ping pong commits on the website.. I raised my concerns, discussed with 
people and accepted the outcome.

> The EU is the home of the vast majority of KDE developers.
>
> (Also I think OS software will be attacked much more in the US once the EU
> decision is over; obviously if someone attacked OS software before it would
> make passage of the EU measure substantially more difficult.  Hence an
> intelligent actor would wait to build its legal base to its strongest level
> before wielding it against a helpless opponent . . . . But I digress.)

That's all speculation though. While existing legislature on software patents 
has affected software development, the doom scenarios people were argumenting 
with have not even come true in the US, despite some very high-profile 
software projects that do have a large development base there.

Still, I signed the petition. I don't agree with the EP proposal.

> > > Certainly an effective  approach to dragging us back down to the dark
> > > ages of KDE PR...  your website must have gotten a lot of publicity? 
> > > Made it #1 on Google?
> >
> > I'm sorry, did I even mention my website in the mail you are replying to?
> >
> > But since you bring it up, yes, we seem to be #1 for "kde
> > anti-americanism", before the Dot. And #2 for "kde anti-american", after
> > it. Since both sites have very relevant content on that matter, I can see
> > why they rank high.
>
> The fact that you would even search for that indicates you are a troll :-(.
>  The articles posted are too stupid to take seriously, so at least they say
> far more about the author than about KDE (see the threads at
> http://dot.kde.org/1062275899/1062492131/).

I never searched for those terms until they appeared in my access_log, when I 
noticed the whole issue has been picked up here and there. Given the topic of 
the discussion, I think those are relevant keywords to answer a question on 
my ratings with.

> What's "Simply Amazing" is the incredible stupidity, inability to
> analogize, inability to comprehend simple writings, and general immaturity,
> unsociability, and disregard / contempt for others that would lead someone
> to write the crap at http://the-amazing.us/simplyamerican/2172/ .

You're entitled to have an opinion on Neil's post. But don't think I share his 
thoughts on it or that it shapes my thoughts on the discussion to what 
extent, if any, politics should be allowed to make KDE.

> > Not that I see why it matters in this discussion, other than that
> > apparently my concerns are invalid to you because a website where Neil
> > and I post has decent Google ratings.
>
> The point is that you actually searched for "KDE anti-ameican" to see your
> ratings.  What does that say about your motive?

Little. I cannot check ratings without entering keywords and those seemed 
relevant to the discussion since it's what Neil's post was about.

If I had a motive to point out KDE was anti-American, it wouldn't make sense 
for me to stick with the project, especially not with an application that has 
tokens which are predominantly showing American culture. Never had a 
complaint about those, not even about the flag. Why is it there? I looked at 
Rob's (here too, Malda) icons and picked a diverse set of the ones I liked.
If people ask for more flags in there, that's fine by me as long as they look 
nice, although I'd probably have to support icon sets then, to avoid too much 
clutter.

Rob
- -- 
Rob Kaper     | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
[email protected] | temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
www.capsi.com | - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/XyTmtppIl2G1SjcRAgsvAKDCj2UffDgMJBvTxdYfxaiBShhGWgCePTCM
s8n+mUt5ob0bE2Xjn/xa5nM=
=RB9s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.