Re: Err... Stupid KMail
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 14 September 2003 07:13, Timothy R. Butler wrote: > filters, etc.). So far, I still prefer KMail in some respects, although > searching is so much faster it isn't funny -- I can search 27,000+ > message subjects in about three seconds vs. about three to five minutes. a subject search in a folder with 6000+ messages which matches 1000+ of those messages takes ~4 seconds (wall clock) on my PII 400. of course, this is a local maildir, and it has 4.5 times fewer emails than the one you searched through, but to inflate 4 seconds to 3-5 minutes is pretty crazy indeed. are you using IMAP? i know that kmail's IMAP isn't the best, though hopefully 3.2 will help address some of those issues (anyone using IMAP w/KMail from HEAD on this list?). i don't use IMAP myself, primarily because i don't care about accessing my mail from anywhere in the world (i have ssh for that =) and i like the speed and convenience of local mail storage. - -- Aaron J. Seigo GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/ZUwR1rcusafx20MRAsFZAJ9lAuiWQyc7/hePvs6oFvQxDxdregCfW+df kEtZO6HJkJGAVHlbvV5SvLw= =PqzH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected] http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.