Re: booklet
Myriam Schweingruber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 13:28, Bernhard Reiter <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Freitag, 17. September 2010 03:54:56 schrieb Carl Symons: >> By coincidence, I used Scribus today as well. It is definitely not as >> intuitive as other applications. But I really don't have much problem >> using it. However, I concur in what Stuart said earlier >> today...especially that it's your choice. The Scribus interface has >> taken me some time to figure out; that's part of the reason that I shy >> away from KWord (my excuse anyway). I kinda like the approach of >> eliminating the reference to InDesign such as Kurt produced. > > I would also suggest to try Scribus next. > From what I know, it is not fully up to par, but getting closer each day. > > I would not try KWord, because so far I've understood that KWord is > a text processing application and not a desktop publishing one. Which is not exactly true: while it is labelled as a Text processor, it certainly uses features very typical for desktop publishing, not really standard in text processing. Maybe that is one of the reasons so many people don't use KWord but tend to go to OpenOffice.org instead: it is actually a DTP tool, although lacking quite some features seen in other DTP applications, and sad to say so, it is not intuitive at all. If it were a text processor, it wouldn't require to choose editing tools every time you try to click on a text... Regards, Myriam. -- Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300) _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.