Re: Feature plan for Gwenview 2.1 (KDE4.1)
Carles Pina i Estany <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:44:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.gwenview |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, On Feb/03/2008, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > # Big changes > > ## Nepomuk integration > This would involve adding support for tagging and commenting files. A > search UI could be useful but is not mandatory: A Nepomuk IOSlave is > under development, we can use it to allow searching for images, we just > need to add a way for the user to easily reach this ioslave. I didn't know anything about Nepomuk (I Googled just now). I don't feel that this is a important feature for image viewer/browser, but maybe it's my point of view (I'm not a user of Nepomuk, etc.) > ## Undo system > Now that we have some "destructive" image operations like resize or > crop, we need an undo system. In the future I would like to add a few > more operations (red-eye correction for example), and it's less work to > add an undo system now than when we have more operations. Very important, to have an Undo system if we have destructive operations! > ## Imload > You probably don't know it because there haven't been a lot of buzz > around it, but KHTML comes with a very efficient image loading library > named Imload. Using this library in Gwenview would give us: > - incremental loading > - faster panning > - support for animated images > I am currently discussing with Imload author to see how we can work > together. Very important. Sometimes I feel that Gwenview is slow when I'm viewing images. I even sometimes use gqview because it loads faster (I guess that because is not a KDE program with KDE libs and all that stuff) and changing images is faster too too. > ## Customize info displayed below thumbnails > Just like in Gwenview 1.4: when looking at digital pictures, the > filename is often useless. It's more interesting to be able to show the > shooting date for example. yeap, I guess that some users wants it (I usually like the photo name, but this is due to my organization) > ## Fullscreen thumbnails > I would like to add a thumbnail row in the fullscreen bar, on the right > of current information. nice! :-) > ## Refactoring: getting rid of the KPart system > Right now the document view loads a KPart to display the current > document: either a GVPart or an SvgPart. This architecture, similar to > Gwenview 1.4, was useful to be able to show video KPart without > implementing video decoding ourself. > This is no longer relevant: thanks to Phonon, it's easy to implement > video decoding. Not going through KParts gives us more control on the > various document view. For example it would be easy to get notified when > a video has finished. This information is necessary to implement an > slideshow which handles video correctly. necessary :-) > ## Fullscreen transitions > All is in the title. Getting rid of the KPart system would make this > easier to implement, in particular with regard to integration with the > fullscreen bar. Yes please, as you maybe remember I like this! > This list is not mean to be exhaustive. I left out other features like > adding back KIPI and external tool support, adding a simple > import-from-camera window, adding DBus methods... If anyone feels like > working on it, you are welcomed! I take note (specially some DBUS or "-s" to start in slideshow as I said long time ago and I have not done anything, yet) About Kipi, why is not in the more "strong" plans? That was allowing to upload photos to Flickr/other services and this is quite common for some users. I think that I also asked it some weeks ago. If somebody is going to Fosdem, drop a mail. -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/