Re: Is PTK a dead end? Or [ UpdateWrapper woes ]

Michael Higgins wrote:
> I'm working on gnome/linux and windows. Activestate port on windows.
> 
> Scripts all work fine on linux, but on win32, I'm having to do all kinds of timing hacks for things to work.
> 
> So, has development ended on PTK, or is it hopeless to maintain (as the author of Tcl::Tk would posit, perhaps).

I am not author, I am the maintainer.

:)


> 
> Any suggestions helpful. 
> 
> How can I get it just to work "as advertised" on Windoze XP?
> 
> $mw->after(500,sub{$mw->deiconify})
> 
> ... is a really stupid workaround, I think. Any thoughts? Are any folks on this list using Perl::Tk on WinXP without getting spurious "UpdateWrapper: Failed to create container" errors?
> 
> Cheers,
> 


--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
ptk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ptk