Re: Is PTK a dead end? Or [ UpdateWrapper woes ]
Michael Higgins <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:52:27 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.tk |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Banfield Group, LLC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:28:13 +0000 vadrer <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael Higgins wrote: > > I'm working on gnome/linux and windows. Activestate port on windows. > > > > Scripts all work fine on linux, but on win32, I'm having to do all kinds of timing hacks for things to work. > > > > So, has development ended on PTK, or is it hopeless to maintain (as the author of Tcl::Tk would posit, perhaps). > > I am not author, I am the maintainer. > > :) > > Sorry! So, in your opinion, PTK is dead? -- Michael Higgins <[email protected]> --++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== ptk mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ptk