Re: WARNING: Skipping faulty header. / trouble with SIEMENS S35 /Kannel WAP /
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wiral Ltd |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi dark, > Now, Kannel implements WSP 1.1 which does not define any Encoding-Version > header. But because of all this, it might be better for Kannel send a > status 400 error reply if a connect request uses unknown headers, rather > than using the capabilities response to signal the problem and then trying > to cope. Certainly it's worth trying, to see if it makes those phones > behave better. Actually Kannel should implement WSP 1.2, because this is a requirement by MMS phones. So starting implement it now is a very good thing. And I agree that some phones (or browsers) may rely on 400 error code. This response much easier to implement than capability negotiations. Aarno