Re: scalability of kannel

Andreas Fink a écrit :
>
> On 25.04.2007, at 16:47, Djiby SY wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to have informations about scalability of kannel.
>> Is kannel scalable?  if yes, how?
>> Any idea is welcome.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> --
>> Djiby
>
> Yes kannel is scaleable by design
> You can run as many SMS boxes and WAP boxes as you want on different 
> machines sharing the load of one bearerbox's traffic.
> Besides that, you can also pile multiple bearerbox/smsbox applications 
> in parallel.
> A bearerbox for wapbox you could only parallelize if you have a 
> application routing messages always to the same bearerbox from the 
> same source.
> But as bearerbox is being built lightweight, leaving the processing to 
> wapbox as much as possible, this should not be an issue.
>
>  
>
> Andreas Fink
>
> Fink Consulting GmbH
> Global Networks Schweiz AG
> BebbiCell AG
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Tel: +41-61-6666330 Fax: +41-61-6666331  Mobile: +41-79-2457333
> Address: Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
> E-Mail:  [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> www.finkconsulting.com www.global-networks.ch www.bebbicell 
> <http://www.bebbicell>.ch
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> ICQ: 8239353 MSN: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> AIM: smsrelay 
> Skype: andreasfink
> Yahoo: finkconsulting SMS: +41792457333
>
>
>
>
>
Thanks for your reply.

 >You can run as many SMS boxes and WAP boxes as you want on different 
machines sharing the load of one bearerbox's traffic.
That's ok.

 >Besides that, you can also pile multiple bearerbox/smsbox applications 
in parallel
what is the interest to have more than one bearerbox in the same machine ?

Is it possible to connect two bearerbox installed in two different 
machines to the same smsc with the same account ?  for fault tolerance.

--
Djiby