Re: [tarkin-dev] Re: Encoder-decoder interface question.

<"Lourens Veen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<Erm, just a quick note so that we don't forget. The Tarkin codec in
<its current state is mainly meant as an experiment with 3D wavelet
<coding, not as a workable codec. Especially with Theora on the way,
<Tarkin is mainly a research project aimed at finding new algorithms
<or even totally new paradigms for the next generation of codecs.
<That said, ofcourse you are free to do whatever you like with it,
<and I think UCI could be the solution to a problem that's been
<mentioned here before, namely whether we want to have a standard
<platform for codec development, something that lets you test your
<codec in an easy way. UCI could do that, since all you'd have to do
<is write a UCI interface and you can test out your codec with your
<favourite video editor (if it supports UCI ofcourse).
<Lourens


I am fully aware Tarkin is not working as a real codec for the time being.
My question was, could anybody from the Tarkin dev team have a look at
http://uci.sf.net and check if UCI offers everything as API that was
necessary to read/write Tarkin streams ? We dont want to find ourselves in
the situation that UCI spec are fixed and can not be used for Tarkin ...

Christian






-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to
$1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v?
http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm
===========================================================================
Universal Codec Interface (UCI) maillist, [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/uci-devel
http://uci.sourceforge.net/