Re: Minutes for release status meeting from 2010-11-15

Kay Ramme <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.releases
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The bundledness matters insofar as the URE is not separately available 
for download from OOo anymore, thus it is quite unlikely that anybody is 
going to combine the unbundled 3.3 URE with a unbundled 3.2.1 OOo.

AFAIK the symbol renaming is just a declarative fix, reverting the patch 
in LibreOffice should solve the issue without any side effects. The 
patch may than be re-applied with a incompatible URE version; or may be 
abandoned with OOo 3.4.

Best

   -Kay



On 11/16/2010 04:56 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:52:17PM +0100, Kay Ramme wrote:
>> If I understand correctly, we have the following scenario ...
>>
>> - unstable brings OOo 3.2.1
>> - experimental brings LibreOffice 3.3
>> - from OOo 3.2.1 to OOo 3.3 jvmaccess, which is part of the URE,
>> accidentally became ABI incompatible because of renamed symbols
>> - upgrading OOo to experimental and downgrading to unstable
>> afterwards leaves the 3.3 URE installed
>
> Yes, but simply because users often don't know the OOo<->  URE connection and
> just don't downgrade that :)
>
>> - because of the incompatibility OOo 3.2.1 does not start anymore
>> - all OOo and LibreOffice are Debian bundled
>>
>> right?
>
> Yes.
>
> (It doesn't matter whether it's Debian-bundled or not, if someone installed
> openoffice.org-ure 3.3 on a OOo 3.2.1 this would have been the same issue)
>
> Grüße/Regards,
>
> René
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.