Fw: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?

"Bill Walton" <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Feb 2003 15:01:48 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption
Message-ID <033c01c2ca35$22ed9c30$6401a8c0@dp2000>
Just got back to my computer for the first time since Monday PM and found
that this had bounced again.  Thought I'd try it one last time.

Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Walton" <[email protected]>
To: "Ron Jeffries" <[email protected]>
Cc: "file" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:55 PM
Subject: Fw: [xpAdoption] Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really
need to know about XP?


> For whatever reason, despite two attempts, this post hasn't made it
through
> to the list.  Didn't want you to think I was ignoring your direct request
> for a response.
>
> Best regards,
> Bill
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Walton" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [xpAdoption] Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really
> need to know about XP?
>
>
> > I'm resending this since it hasn't shown up on the list yet.  My
apologies
> > in advance ff this causes a duplicate posting.
> > Bill
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Walton" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:09 AM
> > Subject: Re: [xpAdoption] Do C-Level managers, and business drivers
really
> > need to know about XP?
> >
> >
> >  Hello Ron,
> >
> >  Since you've specifically asked, I'm happy to participate.  Brief
> comments
> >  below.
> >
> >  Ron Jeffries wrote:
> >
> >  Scott Worley wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all, a slightly diffrent tack of approach on the issue of XP
> > > > Adoption.
> > >
> > > Welcome. We like new angles.
> > >
> > > > Do the high level managers in a company need to know about Agile
this
> > > > or XP that?
> > >
> > > > In my opinion (I am a C-Level Manager) NO, what they/we want is
> > > > results if its due to a new process that the dev team or indeed any
> > > > other team is using, thier team lead/PM should know about it, but
> > > > above that it is not necessary.  A PM can request resource from
> > > > higher management and in most cases the justification is of the
> > > > standard Time/Cost/Resource type. A PM should act as a consultant to
> > > > the teams they ENABLE and the management they provide a service for.
> > >
> > > I'm inclined to agree with you. I think that if XP and Agile deliver
> what
> > > we think they do, the C-level (I am coming to hate that term) people
> will
> > > need to understand the impact, because their planning cycles may be
able
> > to
> > > change. They may be able to demand more concrete information from
their
> > > projects.
> > >
> > > The only reason I can see for knowing much more about it is if they
> wished
> > > to promulgate the ideas further in the organization. Since most of the
> > > top-down installations of XP I've seen have been near-disasters, I'd
> like
> > > to see it coming from the bottom up instead.
> > >
> > > I have the impression that Bill Walton, who lurks here but rarely
> speaks,
> > > thinks that the C-level folks need to know more, or different things.
> > >Bill?
> > > What's your view on this?
> >
> > I'll preface my brief remarks with a qualifier.  I'm talking about the
> > adoption of XP / Agile practices by very large US corporations.  Size
does
> > matter.  A number of organizational dynamics are introduced by size
alone.
> > Also, I'm talking about organization-level adoption, not the "trial
> > projects" that inevitably preceed it but to not necessarily lead to it.
> >
> > Several months ago, as I began my serious investigation into XP, I met
> with
> > a former co-manager at Sabre.  Her VP is adopting XP across his
> > organization; 300+ developers.  Virtually the first words out of her
mouth
> > were these:  "XP is not just another development methodology.  XP is a
> > culture change."
> >
> > Culture change in large organizations is typically a slow, painful
process
> > that requires support from the highest levels.  The changes required for
/
> > enabled by the adoption of XP involve much more than planning cycles.
> It's
> > a mistake, IMO, to underestimate the level of support, and therefore the
> > level of understanding, the successful adoption of XP at an organization
> > level in large US corporations will require from the C-level folks.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bill
> >
> >
>


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/