Fw: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
"Bill Walton" <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Feb 2003 15:01:48 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <033c01c2ca35$22ed9c30$6401a8c0@dp2000> |
Just got back to my computer for the first time since Monday PM and found that this had bounced again. Thought I'd try it one last time. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Walton" <[email protected]> To: "Ron Jeffries" <[email protected]> Cc: "file" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:55 PM Subject: Fw: [xpAdoption] Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP? > For whatever reason, despite two attempts, this post hasn't made it through > to the list. Didn't want you to think I was ignoring your direct request > for a response. > > Best regards, > Bill > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Walton" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:14 PM > Subject: Re: [xpAdoption] Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really > need to know about XP? > > > > I'm resending this since it hasn't shown up on the list yet. My apologies > > in advance ff this causes a duplicate posting. > > Bill > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bill Walton" <[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:09 AM > > Subject: Re: [xpAdoption] Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really > > need to know about XP? > > > > > > Hello Ron, > > > > Since you've specifically asked, I'm happy to participate. Brief > comments > > below. > > > > Ron Jeffries wrote: > > > > Scott Worley wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, a slightly diffrent tack of approach on the issue of XP > > > > Adoption. > > > > > > Welcome. We like new angles. > > > > > > > Do the high level managers in a company need to know about Agile this > > > > or XP that? > > > > > > > In my opinion (I am a C-Level Manager) NO, what they/we want is > > > > results if its due to a new process that the dev team or indeed any > > > > other team is using, thier team lead/PM should know about it, but > > > > above that it is not necessary. A PM can request resource from > > > > higher management and in most cases the justification is of the > > > > standard Time/Cost/Resource type. A PM should act as a consultant to > > > > the teams they ENABLE and the management they provide a service for. > > > > > > I'm inclined to agree with you. I think that if XP and Agile deliver > what > > > we think they do, the C-level (I am coming to hate that term) people > will > > > need to understand the impact, because their planning cycles may be able > > to > > > change. They may be able to demand more concrete information from their > > > projects. > > > > > > The only reason I can see for knowing much more about it is if they > wished > > > to promulgate the ideas further in the organization. Since most of the > > > top-down installations of XP I've seen have been near-disasters, I'd > like > > > to see it coming from the bottom up instead. > > > > > > I have the impression that Bill Walton, who lurks here but rarely > speaks, > > > thinks that the C-level folks need to know more, or different things. > > >Bill? > > > What's your view on this? > > > > I'll preface my brief remarks with a qualifier. I'm talking about the > > adoption of XP / Agile practices by very large US corporations. Size does > > matter. A number of organizational dynamics are introduced by size alone. > > Also, I'm talking about organization-level adoption, not the "trial > > projects" that inevitably preceed it but to not necessarily lead to it. > > > > Several months ago, as I began my serious investigation into XP, I met > with > > a former co-manager at Sabre. Her VP is adopting XP across his > > organization; 300+ developers. Virtually the first words out of her mouth > > were these: "XP is not just another development methodology. XP is a > > culture change." > > > > Culture change in large organizations is typically a slow, painful process > > that requires support from the highest levels. The changes required for / > > enabled by the adoption of XP involve much more than planning cycles. > It's > > a mistake, IMO, to underestimate the level of support, and therefore the > > level of understanding, the successful adoption of XP at an organization > > level in large US corporations will require from the C-level folks. > > > > [snip] > > > > Best regards, > > Bill > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/