RE: Teams Leaders what are they, and do we need them? - Extension from Re: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
"Charlie Poole" <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:44:51 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Glen, > > Generally, I use the word "leader" to refer to the person who > > has emerged as a natural leader of the team. This person has > > a role that basically serves the rest of the team in trying > > to accomplish its goals. I find that teams and their leaders > > can learn to think of it this way and that it's up to > > management to avoid seeing the leader as some sort of a > > junior boss on the team. > > > > So I do have team leaders... but they don't do things > > like make work assignments, evaluate people or make > > decisions about the direction of the project. They do > > present the view (or views) of the team to the manager > > who does need to make some sort of a decision. > > [>] Does this separate leadership from management? There is likely to be > good leaders who are poor managers, as well as very good managers who > are not leaders. At this level - I was taking this thread to deal with the hands-on leader of a team of about half a dozen developers - I think separating team leadership from management is a good idea. In part, I suppose I've arrived at this position by watching a few good managers trying to lead and doing it poorly. Groups at this level are sometimes saddled with a full-time person who "manages" as well as leads. I have seen this fail more often than succeed, so I like to avoid it. Obviously - to me anyway - management skills are needed somewhere up the line. From what I've seen, a good manager can handle five or six projects like this - each with their own team leader. It helps of course if the manager also has good leadership skills, but it seems to be less important when dealing with teams this way as opposed to directly. > > Obviously, such a person can't really be appointed, > > they have to arise from the situation. But in practice, > > the /recognition/ of such a leader has not seemed to > > be that difficult: often everyone on the team would > > name the same person if asked - although sometimes > > not the actual leader. > > [>] This is the "leader" from within. We have those folks here, but also > we have appointed leaders as well, doing just a good a job. Do you try to appoint those with leadership ability, or do they receive it as a side-effect of their appointment? ;-) Charlie Poole [email protected] www.pooleconsulting.com www.charliepoole.org ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/FpY02D/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/