Re: [extremeprogramming] Origin of term "standup"?
"Steve Gordon" <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:09:05 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF7qo6UtvZv86CKhwM64S_8529GZMLoVmaW6G8ibxE5jsgvZyg@mail.gmail.com> |
I agree. Brevity requires that people are providing just enough info to clue the rest of the team if they need help (whether they actually know they need help or not), but the help must NOT be received during the standup. I like to reserve optional time after the standup where people can sit and discuss anything that came up in order to make it clear that the standup itself is not for discussion. On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:01 AM Steve Berczuk <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree about the first point, sort of. keeping the team moving and > collaborating is key for me. > So "impediments" and "did/will do" are important to the extent that it > lets people ask for and receive help. > (with impediments being move valuable than did). But if it is obvious > from the board, don't spend a lot of time on it. > > And short is key, > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#160201): https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/message/160201 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/56090734/2417047 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/leave/4902963/619838065/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-