Re: How to deal with the conflict in your daily work
"J. B. Rainsberger" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.language-of-the-year |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2008-06-16, at 08:47 , M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > J. B. Rainsberger wrote: > > Thank you for letting us know how you feel about Lencioni's book. I > > would appreciate it if you would give me an example of something you > > strongly dislike about the book so I could better understand your > > perspective. Also, you appear to say that Lencioni's work implies > > implementing an authoritarian management style, which I did not > see in > > his work, so I would really appreciate it if you would share some of > > your insight into the connection. > > First of all, it's a fable. As, by a strange coincidence, are "The > One-Minute Manager" and "Leadership Secrets of Attila the Hun". I > don't > like fables. I've only read the one book by Lencioni, so I can't > comment > on the others. And it's been long enough that I can't really remember > how I came up with the link to authoritarianism in that particular > book. > So it appears you don't like fables to illustrate ideas. Do I have that right? Ignoring the fable, what did you think of the rest of "Five Dysfunctions..." where Lencioni describes the model? I would like to know whether the delivery system turned you off or the concepts themselves. I have also read Lencioni's "Five Dysfunctions" field guide, which has no fable, and recently "Three Signs of a Miserable Job", which I rather liked, fable and concepts. I happen to like fables: The Goal, Deadline, Five Dysfunctions... Robert Allen's "One-Minute Millionaire" (?) has a different format: the left-hand pages form a fable and the right-hand pages form a textbook, so you can choose which format you prefer. If you happen to remember the authoritarianism bit, I hope you'll have the energy to come back here and tell me, because you've piqued my curiosity. > Zero tolerance is a personal thing. In the case of gossip, one can > refuse to participate. I'd recommend for a start reading > > http://www.trans4mind.com/counterpoint/blair4.shtml > I much prefer people to act sensibly on their own than have rules needlessly overconstrain their behavior. I certainly prefer open communication to back-channel communication such as gossip. > And, since you brought up the school systems in your link about zero > tolerance, where do you stand on the episode last week where some > highway patrol officers came into classrooms and told the students > that > some of their classmates had been killed by drunk drivers? It turned > out > to have been a hoax and an effort to shock the children and teach > them a > lesson. > > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/12/national/main4177541.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_4177541 > While I understand the impulse to try something drastic when one fails to get through to people, I found their actions cruel. I don't know about consequences for the police and the school system who traumatized these students, but I would hate to see them repeat the experiment. Take care. ---- J. B. (Joe) Rainsberger :: http://www.jbrains.ca Your guide to software craftsmanship JUnit Recipes: Practical Methods for Programmer Testing 2005 Gordon Pask Award for contributions to Agile Software Practice