Re: [AM] Article of Interest in CIO Magazine
"J. B. Rainsberger" <[email protected]> Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:58:14 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.modeling.agile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > In a message dated 3/8/2004 12:49:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > I don't understand any of this. To seem to think that I am a > traditionalist or something. I am not; I am an Agile practitioner and > have been for a few years. > > In viw of the cogent and well-thought-out comments that you have > contributed to this forum in the past, what would give you impression > that i considered you a "traditionalist"? It was the only way I could understand the comments you'd made. I didn't know whether you'd simply misconstrued things I'd written earlier. > If that's the message you took > from my post, I apologize. I intended no offense. I would say more confusion than offence. > Of course, if they were able to deliver a solution as simply, > easily and quickly as they describe, why are they not doing it? Right. My most recent experiences have been unusually good: I have described my approach essentially like so -- 1. Every two weeks we're going to decide what to do for the next two weeks, based on what's important to you, how quickly we're going and whether we got right what you have asked for so far. 2. You are responsible for deciding what we build, although we'll help as much as you want with that. 3. We are responsible for telling you how long it's going to take and you can use that to decide priorities. 4. The more you participate, the better the product will be. 5. At the end of any two-week period, if you don't like the way things are going, then please fire me/us. I'm not afraid to walk away from prospective clients who can't understand these simple principles. I admit that that is not a common situation for people -- and yes, at some point, I'm going to have to "cave in," but that's just an issue of being a good businessman: if you don't have multiple income streams and a reasonable pile of cash in the bank, then you don't have options. I should mention that most of my clients /really/ like point #5. It has taken me a long time to learn how to phrase that well, and in its current incarnation, it elicits a very positive response. Take care. -- J. B. Rainsberger, Diaspar Software Services http://www.diasparsoftware.com :: +1 416 791-8603 Let's write software that people understand For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home Page at www.agilemodeling.com --^---------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrKDA.bWnbtk.Z2NtYS1h Or send an email to: [email protected] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html --^----------------------------------------------------------------