Re: electrical problems with Galvanic Skin Response circuit ( GSR SCL )
Stefan Jung <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.science.openeeg.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC3TAzOOmaBG0Lc5yop+gKuiO+E+uLdgOy=S+hNUC+eJzg0JAA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Steffen I just checked my archive, although I have more than one version of the schematic, they all show R25=1K. You are correct that 1K gives a gain of 101. I scratched out my one and only prototype of this circuit and see that I used a 1003 resistor in that position, i.e. a 100K which gives a gain of 2. I'm not surprised at that documentation fault. I design a schematic, then the PCB, then build and test. For a prototype I don't always go full loop and update my schematic after making adjustments. Sorry. Often some thumb-suck values are placed on the schematic with the intention to do final calculations/adjustments at the time of testing/debugging. Yup, documentation is never much fun, is it? And often the lack thereof comes to bite you later on. Also, the inverting and non-inverting inputs to the AD623 are wrong and need to be swopped (pin 2 and 3). The other PDF showing the SCL calculations, also shows the basic circuit diagram, there the inv & non-inv inputs are shown correctly. BTW, that circuit is not the original Lightstone. It is loosely based on it. The real Lightstone uses 2x AD623 instrumentation amplifiers. The AD623 is not as expensive as the AD620 and similar INAs but I decided to change the front-end and use an opamp instead. This was based on some circuits that I found on the internet from which I further refined the concept. I did fully reverse engineer the schematic of the Lightstone. Similarly I reversed engineered the full circuit of the Emotiv EPOC, but I would not publish these on an open forum. I feel that that wouldn't be quite right. I have, however, sent the circuit back-channel to one or two people in the past, normally asking not to distribute further. For those that follow my occasional writings will know that I have even back-engineered the (analog only part) of the QDS Excalibur 4-channel EEG amp - only from some color photos I was given. As you can imagine, back-engineering something like this can be a lot of work but you learn a lot of things. How to do things and how not do do things. LOL. In the case of the EPOC, I had to desolder a 20-pin 0.05" pin header which holds the digital and analog boards together. That job in itself is not easy. Having spent the time reverse engineering something, I normally draw the schematic in CAD - that is quick enough to do. With SMT circuits, component values are not always noted because SMTs mostly are unmarked and I am only going to lift them with a soldering iron and measure if I consider it a critical value. I only glanced at your message. Implement the gain change and invert those two pins and test again. If you still have problems I can have another look and see if I can give advice. Regards Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech