Re: erronous sorting of traceroute path
nnposter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.nmap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/26/17 2:38 PM, C H wrote: > *Q2: Why is the output not sorted according to the timestamps as stated > in collumn#2?* The latency is calculated from how long it took the original packet to reach the hop where it expired *and* how long it took the ICMP type 11 notification to come back. Some routers tend to prioritize routing packets over internal functions (such as sending the above-mentioned ICMP response). This way it is possible for an ICMP message from hop N+1 to arrive faster than from hop N because the response from N+1 is treated like a routed packet by hop N and therefore given priority over its own ICMP message. Cheers, nnposter _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/