Re: Incremental Backup Question

Miek Gieben <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.hdup.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[On 12 Sep, @00:50, Farrukh wrote in "[hdup-user] Incremental Backup ..."]
>    Hi Miek, hope you are well.

I'm fine, thank you,

>    I am using hdup 1.6.16 - and am carrying out incremental backups. I have a
>    problem in that the size of the incremental archive is v,large, - it is
>    not much smaller than monthly backup. I have checked the archive and it
>    contains files that have not been updated for months. Checking the inode
>    ctime - indicates a change at the beginning of a week but not daily - but
>    the archive size remains same...the affected files are part of a samba
>    share too. Could you let me know how hdup does its incremental decision -
>    and whether it could be changing inode time? I don't really know what is
>    chaning the ctime...


I think I saw this question before.... let me check the (mail) archives...
hmmm... I don't see anything.

The decision to check what should be backed up (when doing an inc.) is entirely
left to tar. (search for --listed-incremental)

You are not using include =  in your config file? What is the under lying
filesystem on the samba share?

    grtz  Miek

--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.

PS amazing: it very quiet on the hdup lists, and then within a week two people
   decide it is time to mail :)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.