Re: pcp updates: pmdadocker
"Marko Myllynen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.pcp |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Lukas, On 2016-12-09 22:39, Lukas Berk wrote: > > If I could get a review on my pmdadocker branch it'd be most > appreciated. More qa needs to be added with a fake http request/reply > but the jist of the pmda is there. This is certainly an interesting area of work! Few higher level questions: - Is this PMDA intended to be purely for Docker-based containers also in the long run or could it be expanded to be a generic pmdacontainer to support alternatives like rkt and OCI as well? Since there is a growing momentum to avoid fragmentation and standardize in this area (see https://www.opencontainers.org/) perhaps it would be wise for PCP to be format/vendor neutral in this area, too? - How do you envision this PMDA to work with container management systems like OpenShift / Kubernetes or Mesos and how it would intermingle with concepts like pods where there is 1-N containers per pod? Are there perhaps plans to provide higher level PCP components which would better match to container management systems' abstraction levels (see also the next question)? - Since containers / pods are most often considered ephemeral and there may be N replicas of a pod running at any time, is this kind of dynamics something in scope for PCP to be aware of? I mean, for example, if there are N replicas of a pod which each happen to contain M containers, and I'd want to get an overview of them, how would this work with PCP? Also, if a node hosting pods goes down or the pods get replaced for whatever reason, how to take this into account, esp. with archive mode? Since higher level management tools abstract away the need to care where and when an individual container is running a tool that merely connects to a single, hand-picked container feels perhaps a bit developer oriented - would you say that this is the intent or my imagination only or merely the current state of affairs which is aimed to be improved during the next steps on this front? Thanks, -- Marko Myllynen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- pcp mailing list [email protected] https://groups.io/g/pcp/messages -=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14884): https://groups.io/g/pcp/message/14884 View All Messages In Topic (2): https://groups.io/g/pcp/topic/3780835 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/3780835?uid=174580 New Topic: https://groups.io/g/pcp/post Change Your Subscription: https://groups.io/g/pcp/editsub?uid=174580 Group Home: https://groups.io/g/pcp Contact Group Owner: [email protected] Terms of Service: https://groups.io/static/tos Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/pcp/leave/354243/563757577/xyzzy -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-