Re: Getting ready for 1.9.15
Adam R.Maxwell <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:37:53 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.latex.latex2rtf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scott,
On Sep 26, 2003, at 09:05, Scott Prahl wrote:
> Do you (or anyone else) have any blockers or must have features?
I'm a relative nobody, but I'd like to see another release. I think
some significant features have made it in over the last year.
I'm not sure if this is a blocker, but it is at least an incomplete
feature in the natbib support that might catch people. I haven't had
time to fully figure out the problem yet, but this is a testcase:
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{natbib}
\bibliographystyle{apalike}
\begin{document}
Certain citations,
\citep[e.g.][]{citekey1, citekey2, citekey3},
cause this output when run through latex2rtf:
(Author1, 1999, ; Author2, 2000, ; Author3, 2001, ) .
The correct output is:
(e.g. Author1, 1999; Author2, 2000; Author3, 2001).
\bibliography{bibfile}
\end{document}
Essentially, citation lists seem to be handled incorrectly when options
are given to \cite.
regards,
Adam Maxwell
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf