Re: Sizes of TL distribution
Frank Mittelbach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.live |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 20.01.26 um 23:55 schrieb Christopher Dimech via tex-live: >> >>> TeX Live needs to have a small basic config + curated collections >>> (e.g. Core Latex Collection) that can be easily added and installed. >>> A small core install that resolves without dependency hell. A two-tier >>> solution to leverage what Frank described. >> as TLC scheme wouldn't fit that bill, it is curated, but it doesn't attempt to be 100% dependency free, that isn't really possible without too much restrictions at least at this point in time. Take for example , the different main classes: article, KOMA and memoir. article is used by many other classes as the basis and there a a large number of packages that are there for extending article with features. Many of them are not compatible with KOMA or memoir because they have their own methods for this. But that doesn't mean you should only add one of the classes ditto with some of the package providing output routine extensions. Not all can be used at the same time, but they are there for different purposes. so on the whole I think TLC as a scheme does well, but it doesn't mean that all of the 500 packages can be loaded together (most can because we produced TLC in one go and loaded many of the packages --- but certainly not all of them. @Karl if https://latex3.github.io/tagging-project/tagging-status/full sorted by TLC3 is not workable (which probably isn't) I can try to make a clear list and also take out the font packages into a separate list ... but not at 1am ... and only if there is some consensus that this is actually work doing frank