Re: [2.96.1] problem: latex generates pdf rather than dvi

Reinhard Kotucha <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Vojta <[email protected]> writes:

    >> It's even easier to say "dvilatex" or "latex --dvionly".

    > Yes.  If one is to replace tex with pdftex, then (at least for
    > plain tex), you're almost required to have \pdf* control
    > sequences turned off, aren't you?

Why?  Why especially for plain TeX?

Regards,
  Reinhard

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha			              Phone: +49-511-4592165
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover	                      mailto:[email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.