Re: three questions about texpower
Jobst Hoffmann <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:38:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texpower.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Fachhochschule Aachen, Abt. Jülich |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Dienstag, den 04.10.2005, 20:52 +0200 schrieb Hans F. Nordhaug: > * Jobst Hoffmann <[email protected]> [2005-10-03]: > > Dear Hans, > > > > I include a small LaTeX-file, which produces nearly the right results > > for me. > > Almost correct isn't good enough :-) By the way, sorry for the late > reply. I agree completely > > > But I've got three questions: > > 1) the texpower documentation says that hyperref can produce spurious > > vertical space, therefor the package fixseminar should be loaded after > > hyperref. > > > > I've done so, but I still find the spurious space; what else can I do? > > Use \parstepwise in stead \stepwise - this is a FAQ (but I'm not sure > if I actually have included it in the FAQ document). I've associated wobbling with fixseminar and not with with parstepwise, it's my fault, sorry! > > > 2) (La)TeXing the file produces a .dvi-file, which can be perfectly > > viewed by xdvi or so. Postprocessing this .dvi-file leads to a .ps-file, > > which is upside down oriented; if I start my viewer I have to turn the > > view accordingly. > > > > Is there any method to avoid this behaviour? > > Yes, probably but it's not a texpower/powersem issue. This is a > feature of seminar. (I don't recommend using seminar, and hence not > powersem either...) But what do you recommend instead? > > > 3) In the example file there are 7 step commands producing with the > > introducing text 8 steps, but step no. 7 and 8 give no new contents. I > > forced producing only 6 steps by setting the counter totalsteps to 6, > > which gives the right result. > > > > Is there a better method to produce no redundant steps? > > Use \restep in stead of \step. In your case I just replaced the last > \step with \restep and got the wanted behaviour. > > > By the way, I think there should be a hint in the docs about producing > > and avoiding such redundant steps > > Yes, maybe we should put more on the \rexxx functions (where "xxx" > can be "step", "switch" and so on). I beg for that, I still have problems with \restep as it doesn't do always what I'm exspecting. > > > Happy TeXing > > Same to you > > Hans > Thank you for your efforts Jobst -- Prof. Dr. Jobst Hoffmann Tel: (0049)-2461-99-3159 Fachhochschule Aachen Abt. Jlich Fax: (0049)-2461-99-3189 Fachbereich 3 email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl