RE: Vault 2.0 install question

"Dan Schreiber" <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:06:02 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.sourcegear-vault.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
A Vault install does not require a reboot...

-Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Eric Sink
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 1:18 PM
> To: 'Vault-List (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: [vault-list] Vault 2.0 install question
>
>
>
> Best practice is to simply install 2.x over 1.x,
> allowing it to perform the upgrade.
>
> I do not think the install requires a reboot,
> but I cannot say for certain.  I'm no expert
> in MSI, but it is my understanding that there
> is a rather complicated set of rules for
> determining whether the machine needs to be
> rebooted or not.  I don't think our installer
> usually asks for a reboot, but if the issue is
> really critical, I would wait for a weekend.
>
> --
> Eric Sink
> Software Craftsman
> http://software.ericsink.com/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Clayton Dool
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:56 AM
> To: Vault-List (E-mail)
> Subject: [vault-list] Vault 2.0 install question
>
> Due to the workload on the server which vault is installed on, we are only
> able to reboot the server on weekends (else alot of unhappy users).  When
> installing Vault 2.0, does it require a reboot?  What is best practice for
> installing with a major upgrade (from 1.x to 2.x)?
>
> ---------------------------
> Clayton Dool
> Application Developer, Axium
> 503.350.2156
> [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vault-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> vault-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list