Re: Multiple ways of accessing content
Sam Spicer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.chi-web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hullo,
I'll not beat the point to death, but I do agree that having multiple
ways to the same information can be valuable. The one caveat, that
David touched on, is that you should try and reduce the potential for
confusion.
The biggest question that I try to ask myself might be: "Now that I
am here, do I have enough cues to get back here, even if not by the
original path that I took."
An simple example of this might be if a user navigated to a piece of
content via the sites search engine. Once they get there, is the
breadcrumb prominent enough and the navigational cues strong enough
to indicate where the content lives in the sites hierarchical structure.
With conventions like faceted navigation, dynamic breadcrumbs, or
other automated means of enhancing "findability" of content, I think
it's more important to reinforce where content actually lives and the
constant way to return to it. Dynamic paths can always change, search
result position can move, so try and tell the user the context of
where they've landed. And, for goodness sakes, make it bookmark
friendly.
Best Regards,
Sam
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the Day: Use the archives to research common questions
CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
--------------------------------------------------------------