Re: what happened to the automatic fetching of website icons?
Michael Torrie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 22:35 -0500, philip dahlquist wrote: > the thing i loved about galeon was that it automatically grabbed the > icon for the website, and it used it for the bookmark so you could put > it on the bookmark toolbar. I'm running the latest Galeon 1.3.19 and it grabs the icons for bookmarsk just fine. > > what happened to all the customization that was in galeon 1.2? i really > don't understand this trend towards providing less. it's like rh8, it > was less customizable than rh7.3, and it's a trend, both in user > interface and browsers, rh9: lesser; fedora:lessest. I have yet to need any preference that's not already provided by Galeon 1.3, expect maybe proxy exceptions. To be fair that's gnome's job, not Galeon's. > > i don't get it. where's the throbber selection, where's the theme for > buttons/icons, where's the choice for text w/ icons, under icons, no > text; what about external mail handler, download manager? The themes are managed by gnome, as they should be. As for the throbber, I personally have never had any reason to change it. All the other options you mention are also controlled by gnome, as it should be, since galeon is a gnome application. You can control this in gnome's preferences. If you want a gtk-only browser, I suggest you take a look at skipstone. > > what happened to all the things that made galeon 1.2 a better choice > than mozilla or netscape. if i wanted firefox or internet explorer, i > wouldn't have taken all this time to get mozilla 1.7.5 and gecko to try > to get galeon 1.2.14 to compile, then ask the user list for help, then > get galeon 1.3.19, set the stupid bonobo bonehead server setting cuz > it didn't run right out of the box. that bobobobonobobobo crap should > have been taken care of by the 'make install' command or somewhere in > the build process, not in an 'oh, yeah, um, you know, if you get a > message that bonehead can't find the gnome.server thing, um, we forgot > to do that while we were so busy tearing the guts out of "the web, only > the web", um, that you have to do it. and, um, you might want to reboot, > too. sorry, i mean, you have to reboot' All the things that I like about galeon are here. With a few tweaks, though, firefox is everything galeon is. I run galeon mainly because I like how the tabs work better than firefox and that galeon is noticeably faster than firefox. You knew at the outset that galeon is a gnome application. Therefore it does have dependencies on gnome libraries and gnome daemons. Gnome is currently at 2.10. Therefore to run galeon you need at least all the gnome 2.4 dependencies up and running. Galeon is only meant to standalone within the context of gnome. I also recommend you stick to binary packages. This way the dependencies are already sorted out for you. There is no reason for make install to take care of bonobo. Bonobo is a completely separate library. You have to first make sure it is built and installed correctly and then install galeon. You also have to make sure that the galeon bonobo component definitions are placed in the correct path where bonobo can find them. (Hint: If bonobo was built using /usr as its prefix, then you should build galeon with a /usr prefix also; installing galeon to /usr/local won't work unless you copy or symlinks some files back into /usr) For binaries of galeon for practically any fedora or redhat distribution, see dag wieers' site: http://dag.wieers.com/home- made/apt/packages.php > > firefox hahahahahahahahahaha, laughing maniacally, internet EXPLODER!!, > here come the guys with strait jacket. Lost me on that one. They are coming for whom? You, firefox, galeon, or IE? > > you know, m&m's gave us back the red m&m, and guess what, they made a > bunch of new colors, and we got to vote on them, too. can i have my > autofetch website icon function back? Do you mean in real-time? Every time you open the bookmarks list it has to go fetch a load of icons? No thanks. If you mean each bookmark has a static icon associated with it that was downloaded at the time the bookmark was created, then I am already seeing that. > > you know what happens when you click on an email address? you get the > evolution setup wizard. That's because your gnome settings have evolution as the default mail handler. Change it in your gnome preferences. The fasted way to do this (and regardless of distro) is to run gconf-editor and change the keys in /desktop/gnome/url-handlers for mailto. You can change your default browser by setting the /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/http and https keys. > > you know if you put bookmarks on the toolbar, you don't even get a > tooltip to remind you what the abbreviation you used to rename the > bookmark is because you didn't want one bookmark title taking up half > the bookmark toolbar, even mozzarella does that. Should be an easy fix. Perhaps a developer can respond to this. > > what happens when you click on a link in the galeon help manual? > it pulls up.....drum roll....firefox.....rim shot.? Again. You need to set the default handlers in gnome's preferences. galeon's help manual is displayed in yelp, a gnome app. It's not directly related to Galeon. You'll have to excuse my frustrations with this post, but you seem to misunderstand how gnome works and what components make up the gnome desktop. Granted this discussion may indicate some serious deficiencies in Gnome itself and ease of use issues. > > actually, all i want is for someone to explain the motivation behind > galeon 1.3.19, just 'what happened', that's all. There is plenty of documentation on the hows and whys both on the web site and in the archives for this list. Every possible issue you can imagine with regards to 1.2.x vs 1.3.x has been thoroughly hashed and rehashed on this list. Please search the archives and you can find more reasons for and against this simplification than you ever wanted to know. > > or, i got it, just tell me how to get 1.2.14 to compile and i'll go back > to that and leave the list in peace. fair enough?? You can't do it. Mozilla has officially dropped support for GTK1 and gnome 1.x is obsolete. > <snip> > galeon ... looks a lot like ... firefox. Well, of course. Firefox has taken on the gnome look and feel when running on linux. Galeon is a native gnome app based on gtk. Therefore yes, they will look very similar. Firefox has adopted the gtk look and feel for tabs (mostly), so the tabs will look similar to galeon. > > philip dahlquist > > by the way, i am hoping that this generates -alot- (sick) (sic) of responses, > <snipped irrelevant stuff> Just a hint here. If you really want to get some professional responses to your complaints, please write less informally. Otherwise you will only be disappointed and walk away thinking the Galeon developers are elitist snobs when in fact you simply need to approach them a better way. Michael -- Michael Torrie <[email protected]> ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click