Re: [phpOpenTracker-User] Speeding up OpenTracker Reporting

Sebastian Bergmann wrote:

> 
>  A "real" reporting tool based on the phpOpenTracker API would work quite
>  different from this example application.

What kind of differences would it have? I can see some simple things
like letting the user decide the time range and which report to generate
instead of generating the whole lot of them. But other than that I can
see of the top of my head how else a 'real' reporting tool based on
phpOpenTracker would be different.

Also do you have any data on how well POT scales? I.e. could it be used
for a site that as, for example, >100,000 document requests being logged
per day?

I have been using analog for large apache log files ( > 10 GB) but I
can't see phpOpenTracker being useable on a high traffic site like mine
which generates daily log files of 1GB ...

I hope I am wrong because I would really like to use POT to track that
site :)

Jean-Christian Imbeault



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf