Re: let's talk about pyblosxom's future

Regarding static site generators and overhead:
I made a mention to the pyblosxom IRC some time ago about an approach
I wanted to use for static site generation. The gist being that I
wanted to have the blog itself be static, but any submit actions, such
as comments or polls or whatever, would trigger the dynamic platform,
which would run a generation algorithm being based on "make", i.e.,
only generating files that depended on the changed action. I never got
around to hacking it in, but I wanted to try it out on something when
I get the time.

Do any of the suggested alternatives work that way?
-- =

This email is:=A0 =A0 [ ] actionable=A0=A0 [ ] fyi=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [x] social
Response needed:=A0 [ ] yes=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [x] up to you=A0 [ ] no
Time-sensitive:=A0=A0 [ ] immediate=A0 =A0 [ ] soon=A0 =A0 =A0=A0 [x] none

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and =

threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions =

will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware =

threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/