Re: Open source WO - offer [Apple WWDC 2006 statement]
Ashley Aitken <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:09:21 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/08/2006, at 7:13 AM, Marc Oesch wrote: > Ok, here is the famous Apple statement...fresh off the Internet: > > http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2006/Aug/msg01144.html I *am* pleasantly surprised. > I see two options I mentioned earlier: > > #1 The *positive* interpretation: Apple develops a super-duper WO 5.x > or 6.0, ie. Apple can now focus more resources on WebObjects runtime > sans tools..and implement support for old wishes (multithreads) and > new things (AJAX and any upcoming buzzword ) faster. > Apple is closely working with the community in the future regarding > tools etc. Yes, Apple's decision could be taken positively (and a sensible one) since there was no real way they could compete in the Java-space with Java IDEs like Eclipse (IMHO). Even not redeveloping EOModeler in Java could be justified because of the great open source effort in WOLips. And I guess one could say the same for WOBuilder - it also didn't provide that much (besides nice integration, drag-and-drop, object hierarchy browsing etc). > #2 The *negative* interpretation: The statement is mostly PR to > appeal to the community since Xcode is going away. Apple is still > letting development languish outside of Apple and there is no major > update coming. Apple can outsource costs without giving too much back > in return.. Yes, Apple's decision could be taken negatively as just another step in their move to deprecate WebObjects itself (you can't do much less than they have been doing lately). Personally, my gut tells me this is probably the more likely case. We haven't seen a major update for years, the team it seems is quite small etc. What has changed now? They may save some effort on tools but will they really be applying that to pushing WO forward? > Only time will tell which interpretation is right - which might > greatly affect the decision to make an opensource effort needed one > day. Yes, again, it's unfortunate we can't take Apple at their word. Cheers, Ashley. -- Ashley Aitken Perth, Western Australia mrhatken at mac dot com Skype Name: MrHatken (GMT + 8 Hours!)