Re: Need for a collaborative development of WML

On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> First of all, thanks a lot for your meaningful comments, I will read
> them carefully.  I see also no reason not to implement your suggestion
> above.
> 
> But the main point of this mail is about WML development: I am not
> responsive, and did not work on it for a very long time.  Even if it
> is in a pretty good shape (let me know if I am wrong ;)), this
> inactivity must stop.
> 
> So I believe that WML should migrate to a collaborative development
> platform, like Savannah.  Did some of you experiment other platforms?
> We need mailing lists (several -- archived -- ability of sending CVS
> commit logs/diffs to a ML -- a search engine would also be great),
> CVS (with import/export of repositories), bug reports.
> Dynamic pages could be a plus, but are not necessary.

	This sounds like a great idea! I've used both sourceforge and savannah
in the past, but not much else. I don't really have a preference between
those two, and would certainly be glad to offer my opinions on any other
platform which is suggested (I have plenty of opinions! :).
_____________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML)                         http://thewml.org
User Support Mailing List                        [email protected]
Automated List Manager                            [email protected]