Re: FileSystemStorage interaction with manage_copy|pasteObjects()
Jodok Batlogg <jodok.batlogg-H84adUgip2a/3pe1ocb+swC/[email protected]> Tue, 23 May 2006 19:34:18 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andreas Jung wrote: > Copying and pasting AT objects using FSS basically works fine as long as > you copy the objects directly. How when you copy/paste a folder > containing AT > objects using FSS then the content on the filesystem is not copied over > to the new object. I tried some hacks to workaround this problem however > I got stuck at some point. Anyone having had similar problems or a > solution for this issue? unfortunately i have no solution for this issue, but i'm very interested in your experience with FSS. we decided against FSS and are using ExternalStorage for our projects. ES is pretty stable although it is still very fragile. it seems like FSS handles copy/move more intelligent (in theory :)) and has some other advantages. nevertheless ES has quite some unittests... i'm wondering how much time/money we would need to get either/both of FSS and ES rock solid. in roughly 3 month we need to have it in production. i'm still willing to switch between FSS and ES as needed... and i'm willing to spend some money too. jodok > > Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642