Re: What I think we should focus on now

Joachim Werner <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:52:23 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.zope2-migration
Organization iuveno AG
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Paul Everitt schrieb:
> 
> On Thursday, Feb 13, 2003, at 12:42 Europe/Paris, Joachim Werner wrote:
> 
>> Zope 2 is not perfect, and a rewrite makes sense. But still Zope 2 is 
>> a very good product. I'd compare it with Apache 1 vs. 2, not with the 
>> ACS. This fits better.
> 
> 
> On this, I don't think it is completely accurate.  If I have 1,000 HTML 
> files, 500 PHP files,  and 100 CGI scripts, and I switch to Apache2, 
> then they should all work unchanged.

I didn't want to strech the analogy that much. Of course there a 
differences between Apache and Zope ...

If you have content objects in Zope 2 (files, images, basic HTML, CSS 
etc.), I am sure you will be able to just upload them into Zope 3. You 
can even upload PHP code (as long as you have a place outside Zope that 
actually does something useful with it).

The problem is with the code, not the content. And with PHP, you can't 
actually run them in Apache 2 because the mpd_php module is not out yet 
for Apache 2 (at least not in a final release).

> Unless I'm missing something, we're not exactly promising the same thing 
> for Zope. :^)
> 
> OTOH, if I write something in C that talks directly to the Apache API, 
> then I might or might not have some work to do.

You WILL have to rewrite the module. Even the concept of modules in 
general has changed. It's like the fundamental changes in Zope 3 
(XML-based config files etc.) ...


Joachim

-- 

iuveno AG

Joachim Werner

_________________

Wittelsbacherstr. 23b
90475 Nürnberg

[email protected]
www.iuveno.de

Tel.: +49 (0) 911/ 9 88 39 84