Re:
Christoph Schittko <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:21:33 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.jobs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Check out the article named: Momentum Software Wins Another "Offshore Rescue" On http://schneider.blogspot.com For another opinion on that topic ;) As far as another offshore project goes that I is currently conducted at the company where I am presently at, I can't say that it's very cost effective up to this point. So far it's been wearing out the local staff that's supporting the ramp-up in India with late night phone conferences, and other issues. Unless they get productive there soon, I can't see any cost advantage over having the work done here. I don't know if that's representative for each and every project moved offshore, but I have yet to meet someone who's glowingly telling me about a completely successful offshore project. I just wish decision makers would talk to the same people I do. Christoph > -----Original Message----- > From: Unmoderated DOTNET job forum [mailto:DOTNET- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry O'Brien > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:20 PM > To: [email protected] > > > "To me, the overall market seems to be moving towards inexpensive > > incompetence: under-specified, under-bid, and under-delivered > > projects. But the monthly bill is less!" > > > > > > Absolutely...and about a year from now there will be a lot of > > jobs open in order to fix the "work" done by these scrubs today. > > True, but will the "fixes" be done by what Tom called "artisanal" > programmers? For that matter, if the scrubs say "This is what is known as > iterative and incremental development, you got something out there fast > and > cheap, it doesn't quite meet your needs, and now we modify it," what will > you argue? Scrubs modifying sloppy code will eventually become bogged down > (probably), but not for several iterations of their sloppiness. And, as a > good programmer, you will probably be _more_ pessimistic than the scrubs > if > you're up to bid for the fixing job: they'll say "Oh, we can change that," > and you'll say "It's a complete mess and to prepare for the future, you > should refactor the whole thing." > > These thoughts are making me reconsider my long-held viewpoint that > certifications are a waste. Any MCADs or MCSDs on the list care to share > their cost-benefit analyses?