Re: docgen / XP / scripting v5.6

Its a real AV, here's the call stack dumped from VS.NET (ntsd showed
something similar, but not as pretty !)

>       mcsvr.dll!640110c9() =09
        mcsvr.dll!6400ff4c() =09
        mcsvr.dll!64018852() =09
        wkcore.dll!672465b6() =09
        wizrun.exe!0041d69b() =09
        KERNEL32.DLL!77e7eb69() =09

I did have Everett Installed on the machine, but i've since
uninstalled that, just in case, made no difference [although it could
of left something behind]

it consistently crashes at the same point, it might be related to the
MSXML version, I'm running 4.0 SP1 on the box that crashes and=20
plain old 4.0 on the box that's ok.

I had as little else as possible running at the time.

Cheers
Simon

On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:40:01 -0800, in genx you wrote:

>Yikes... sorry to hear that, Simon.  No, I haven't seen this.  DocGen =
passes all my tests on XP SP1 -- although admittedly none of them could =
be considered "largish".
>
>Is it really a true access violation in wizrun.exe, or some kinda =
script-level crash?  In either case, can you give me more info?  Like the=
 module responsible for the av?  Maybe try attaching a debugger to =
wizrun.exe...
>
>    ntsd -g wizrun.exe DocGenWizard.gxw
>
>(When you hit an av, it will break -- type "kb" to get a raw binary =
stack trace... should include module info, at the very least... maybe =
even offsets from exports, I forget.)
>
>You never know, if it's a really dodgy timing-related bug in the v5.6 =
script engine, then running under a debugger might even solve the =
problem.  :-/  (Not trying to shuck responsibility, but it wouldn't be =
the first such bug I've seen.. ;-)
>
>-S
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Simon Fell" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 22:04
>Subject: docgen / XP / scripting v5.6
>
>
>I have a largish docgen project, which runs fine on my w2k box, but
>attempting to run it on XP (which has v5.6 scripting engines), its
>gets about a third of the way through, then dies with an access
>violation.
>
>Anyone else seen anything like this ?
>
>Thanks
>Simon
>
>This is a private list, meaning only subscribers may post to the list or=
 view
>the online archives. Subscribers can read messages from the Gen<X> =
archive or
>unsubscribe from Gen<X> at http://discuss.develop.com/genx.html.
>
>This is a private list, meaning only subscribers may post to the list or=
 view
>the online archives. Subscribers can read messages from the Gen<X> =
archive or
>unsubscribe from Gen<X> at http://discuss.develop.com/genx.html.

This is a private list, meaning only subscribers may post to the list or view
the online archives. Subscribers can read messages from the Gen<X> archive or
unsubscribe from Gen<X> at http://discuss.develop.com/genx.html.