RE: Another teleconference partial edited transcript
"Rich Murphey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001601c3017c$29d6eeb0$690010ac@a> |
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Damien Miller > David Dawes wrote: > > But you've been around long enough to realise that you can use > > manipulative statements like this to your advantage. If I call you > > out on your "mistakes", I'm seen as being defensive. Do you wonder > > why some of us might be wary of attending a private meeting > when the > > mechanism for publishing it is also so easy to manipulate? > > I think that it is very easy to be seen as defensive when you > pounce on the assumption that mistakes that could be explained > by lack of organisation are evidence of malice. If you really > want to mend these rifts, you could start by being a little > more tolerant. And you who has no direct knowledge of anything that has happened over the last year think that you can dictate the behavior of someone who's been targeted. That is exceedingly lame. > It is also extremely hypocritical for you to accuse this ad-hoc > group of "unopenness" or manipulative tactics, when the XFree > BOD has (so far) not demonstrated *any* openness either in its > internal deliberations or in substantiating the venomous > accusations made against Keith Packard. Cool, so you know what's going on? Why don't you enlighten us? I'd love to get a better understanding, the since you seem to know who is the good guy and who is the bad guy. please tell us what you know about the events.to Rich