RE: Another teleconference partial edited transcript

"Rich Murphey" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <001601c3017c$29d6eeb0$690010ac@a>
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Damien Miller
> David Dawes wrote:
> > But you've been around long enough to realise that you can use 
> > manipulative statements like this to your advantage.  If I call you 
> > out on your "mistakes", I'm seen as being defensive.  Do you wonder 
> > why some of us might be wary of attending a private meeting 
> when the 
> > mechanism for publishing it is also so easy to manipulate?
> 
> I think that it is very easy to be seen as defensive when you 
> pounce on the assumption that mistakes that could be explained 
> by lack of organisation are evidence of malice. If you really 
> want to mend these rifts, you could start by being a little 
> more tolerant.

And you who has no direct knowledge of
anything that has happened over the last year
think that you can dictate the behavior of
someone who's been targeted.  That is
exceedingly lame.  

> It is also extremely hypocritical for you to accuse this ad-hoc 
> group of "unopenness" or manipulative tactics, when the XFree 
> BOD has (so far) not demonstrated *any* openness either in its 
> internal deliberations or in substantiating the venomous 
> accusations made against Keith Packard.

Cool, so you know what's going on?  Why don't you enlighten us?

I'd love to get a better understanding, the
since you seem to know who is the good guy
and who is the bad guy.  please tell us what
you know about the events.to 

Rich
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.