Re: Re: Kobo Mini e-reader
Dennis Phelan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.backpacking.light |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE1UnwRettQXzB6tj5pxbNxzuKoaKo30f7HiXRg4AnCFS=A=fg@mail.gmail.com> |
For what it is worth; I suggest getting an e-reader without a back-lit screen. I have both the original Kindle and a new Kindle Fire. While I like the Kindle Fire; it sucks battery power. The original Kindle battery lasts for weeks, but you need to use a head lamp at night. Also the original kindle is lighter than the fire. Dennis On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Eric Green <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jge@...> wrote: > > I've been thinking of getting an e-reader (for backpacking) and this new > one looks like it's lighter (4.7oz) and smaller than previous offerings, > and cheaper than most. Anyone have trail experience with it ? > > I looked at Kobo before and the big problem is getting eBooks for it. An > eBook reader is no good without eBooks. Your best bet is either the Nook or > Kindle ecosystem, because both have a lot of eBooks available for them. At > 6 to 7.5 ounces they're still lighter than carrying seven or eight > paperback books with you (you can easily read seven or eight books before > needing to charge them), but you can *get* books for them -- a lot of > books, at reasonable prices. Kobo is pretty much stuck with accessing > smaller eBook stores that have higher prices and less selection than Amazon > and B&N. > > >