Re: Re: Kobo Mini e-reader

Dennis Phelan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.backpacking.light
Message-ID <CAE1UnwRettQXzB6tj5pxbNxzuKoaKo30f7HiXRg4AnCFS=A=fg@mail.gmail.com>
For what it is worth;  I suggest getting an e-reader without a back-lit
screen.  I have both the original Kindle and a new Kindle Fire.  While I
like the Kindle Fire; it sucks battery power.  The original Kindle battery
lasts for weeks, but you need to use a head lamp at night.  Also the
original kindle is lighter than the fire.

Dennis


On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Eric Green <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "John" <jge@...> wrote:
> > I've been thinking of getting an e-reader (for backpacking) and this new
> one looks like it's lighter (4.7oz) and smaller than previous offerings,
> and cheaper than most. Anyone have trail experience with it ?
>
> I looked at Kobo before and the big problem is getting eBooks for it. An
> eBook reader is no good without eBooks. Your best bet is either the Nook or
> Kindle ecosystem, because both have a lot of eBooks available for them. At
> 6 to 7.5 ounces they're still lighter than carrying seven or eight
> paperback books with you (you can easily read seven or eight books before
> needing to charge them), but you can *get* books for them -- a lot of
> books, at reasonable prices. Kobo is pretty much stuck with accessing
> smaller eBook stores that have higher prices and less selection than Amazon
> and B&N.
>
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.