The Straight Dope 04/22/2005
[email protected] Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:00:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-853940-2005.04.22-04.00.03--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 04/22/2005 Dear Cecil: I was making fun of a colleague at work who has recently returned to smoking cancer sticks. His retort was, "Yeah, well, tall people die younger." Since I'm about 6-7, this hit me right in the heart--which I suspect is the organ at fault. Is his claim true? --Tom Slattery, via e-mail ~~~~~~ SUPER SDMB SUBSCRIPTION SPECIAL! Act now and save big on a subscription to the Straight Dope Message Board. For details, see: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=309616 ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: You actually acknowledge the possibility this shrimp may be right? Some might call that a very untall attitude. The classic short-guy's-nightmare response would be more like: Look, little man (that's how 6-2 George H. W. Bush once referred to 5-10 Nicaraguan president Daniel Ortega), everybody knows tall people, particularly tall men, are not only healthier, they're more successful, smarter, sexier, and more widely looked up to (duh, but you see how heightist bias is embedded in the language). For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/050422.html STAFF REPORT Dear Straight Dope: Did the three wise men actually come to visit Jesus when he was born, as the myth says? If three wise men from the Orient were willing to track down Jesus when he was born, why wasn't there a conversion of faith where they were from? It kind of seems like European ego boosting to me. --Ben Reeves, Tempe, AZ SDSTAFF Euty replies: Okey dokey, let's do a little deconstruction here. First, let's look at the verses in question. Since it's the most familiar, we'll use the King James version as our jumping off point. Here's Matthew 2:1-12: Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, "Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the East, and have come to worship him." When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him; and assembling all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. They told him, "In Bethlehem of Judea; for so it is written by the prophet: 'And you, O Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for from you shall come a ruler who will govern my people Israel.'" Then Herod summoned the wise men secretly and ascertained from them what time the star appeared; and he sent them to Bethlehem, saying, "Go and search diligently for the child, and when you have found him bring me word, that I too may come and worship him." When they had heard the king they went their way; and lo, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came to rest over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they rejoiced exceedingly with great joy; and going into the house they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh. And being warned in a dream not to return to Herod, they departed to their own country by another way. We'll assume the story is true, although scholars disagree about whether it actually happened or merely symbolized Christian belief that Jesus was the King before whom all other kings would bow down. Certainly the episode has its fishy aspects. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mwisemen.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC - 06/20/1986 Dear Cecil: Does anyone know how to spell the "mad dog's" name? Time spells it Muammar Gaddafi, the TV stations spell it Moammar Khaddafi, and my roommate tells me she's seen it spelled Qaddafi. Now all of a sudden there's a rush to start spelling it Gadhafi. What's the deal? --S. Johnsen, Chicago Cecil replies: Lord knows I hate to be critical, but the proliferation of spellings for the name of Libya's head dude has been one of the continuing scandals of American journalism. I mean, come on, we're trying to plumb this guy's psychic depths and we can't even get his name straight? Sometimes I shudder for the future of my country. I count at least 12 different ways to spell the colonel's handle, including Qaddhafi (New York Review of Books), Qaddafi (New Republic), Gaddafi (Time), Kaddafi (Newsweek), Khadafy (Maclean's), Qadhafi (U.S. News & World Report), Qadaffi (Business Week), and Gadaffi (World Press Review). Libya's UN mission, in an effort to spread further confusion, spells the name Qathafi, and I know I've seen Gadaafi somewhere. To make matters worse, the Library of Congress and the Middle East Studies Association, to whom one would ordinarily look for guidance, have a fondness for Qadhdhafi, which is an abomination unto God. I think you now begin to grasp the dimensions of the problem. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_264b.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2005 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]