Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> Sun, 8 May 2005 06:01:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 7 mai 2005 à 13:53, Geert Stappers a écrit : > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:02:12AM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote: >> Le 7 mai 2005 à 03:07, David Malcolm a écrit : >> >> I made two propositions: >> 1 - One for the example folder: cnxml.xml >> a - First to change the url which was wrong, this one was >> integrated. >> b - A second one to give a newer example, because the current one >> is based on a very old version, it was never integrated. >> >> The example validates, but does not display correctly. >> >> 2 - Another one for the dispspec: cnxml.xds.in >> To change the url, this was integrated. >> To provide a spec conformed to the standard, this one was not >> integrated. >> >> Generating a cnxml document does not work properly. It creates a non >> validating document, because the dispspec is not conforming the >> standard. >> > > Could you please resend the patches? > My apology for the inconvience. As soon as the problem on faq is solved, I'd be able to compile conglomerate and rebuild the patches, then send them to you. Cheers, Michèle <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>