Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml

Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> Sun, 8 May 2005 06:01:49 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 7 mai 2005 à 13:53, Geert Stappers a écrit :
> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:02:12AM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
>> Le 7 mai 2005 à 03:07, David Malcolm a écrit :
>>
>> I made two propositions:
>> 1 -  One for the example folder: cnxml.xml
>>   a - First to change the url which was wrong, this one was  
>> integrated.
>>   b - A second one to give a newer example, because the current one
>> is based on a very old version, it was never integrated.
>>
>> The example validates, but does not display correctly.
>>
>> 2 -  Another one for the dispspec: cnxml.xds.in
>> To change the url, this was integrated.
>> To provide a spec conformed to the standard, this one was not
>> integrated.
>>
>> Generating a cnxml document does not work properly. It creates a non
>> validating document, because the dispspec is not conforming the
>> standard.
>>
>
> Could you please resend the patches?
> My apology for the inconvience.
As soon as the problem on faq is solved, I'd be able to compile  
conglomerate and rebuild the patches, then send them to you.

Cheers,
Michèle
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>