Re: [poedit-users] Re: Bug in TM-function?

Thanks for clearification, Vaclav.

As I am new to poedit and gettext, I am not aware of 
all consequences, which result from that behaviour.
So I can't tell, wether it is worth to add some special
treatment.

In every case it should be avoided, that "fuzzy-autotranslation"
(read: potentially wrong translations) slip without notice 
into the final mo-file.

I'll come back to that point, if I hae a better conception
of that stuff.

Thanks anyway so far
CHristof



Hi,

Christof Schardt wrote:
> > Sorry, but this is *impossible*.
>
> Ok, let's reproduce the impossible ;-)

I saw this one coming... ;-)

> http://www.christof-schardt.de/poedit/doku.html
> 
> Maybe this helps to find the reason for the strange
> behaviour.

Yes, it does, thanks! This translation is coming from msgmerge program 
from gettext suite that is used to merge newly found strings with the 
catalog. It has some capabilities for guessing translations itself 
and so it sometimes fills translations in (and marks them as fuzzy) 
even before poEdit's TM comes into play. Since the 
msgmerge-autotranslated entries look like any other fuzzy entries. I 
guess poEdit could keep track of newly added strings and check for 
fuzzy-translated ones (and mark them as TM-translated), but I'm not 
sure it's worth the effort to be honest.

Regards,
Vaclav

-- 
PGP key: 0x465264C9, available from http://pgp.mit.edu/

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vaclav Slavik" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 10:36 AM
Subject: [poedit-users] Re: Bug in TM-function?




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click