Re: Sophocles Antigone - Question re English/German translations
Patrick Ozzard-Low <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:57:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.education.classics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJXC5_OjtEibFuOdY_q8E8okekDohDbSvhSAdmG9TZp9dfNxxA@mail.gmail.com> |
Good parallel, thanks! The Bard at his best. But he is surely saying both - no?: " How noble in reason, how infinite in faculty.............. And yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me; no, nor Woman neither" Unless, perhaps, Hamlet's depression discounts the conclusion? But I doubt it. Shakespeare understood as much as anyone of the human soul.... Patrick On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 1:55 PM John Ayer <[email protected]> wrote: > Compare the reading of Hamlet when he says > > What a piece of work is a man. > > Is the reading awed, reverential? Or sardonic? > > In today=E2=80=99s world when we say =E2=80=9Cboy, he=E2=80=99s a piece o= f work,=E2=80=9D the reading is > definitely sardonic. I wonder if Shakespeare would have intended it tha= t > way. > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fen.m.= wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWhat_a_piece_of_work_is_a_man&data=3D02%7C01%7CC= LASSICS-L%40lsv.uky.edu%7C4dce13ff114049c0a9cc08d77d815b51%7C2b30530b69b644= 57b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637115866844304793&sdata=3DfDaLt0qaINBxbln= F0jxK1CulgHUm%2BpltetMqRnvIwOM%3D&reserved=3D0 > > Jack Ayer > Professor Emeritus-Law > UC Davis > > On Dec 10, 2019, at 8:01 AM, Patrick Ozzard-Low <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello > > > > Please excuse slow reply =E2=80=93 little time! Awfully nice responses; a= n awesome > thread; wondrous information. ;-) Thank you. > > > > Yes, Jebb translates as =E2=80=98wonder/terror=E2=80=99. Heidegger I stud= ied closely in my > youth. > > > > BUT: is it not strange that in English (I could name probably 30 versions > off the top of my head) that speak of the *wonder* of man=E2=80=94while, = in German, > man is predominantly *Ungeheuer* / *Ungeheuere*r? I believe this German > word conveys: monstrous, scandalous, iniquitous, enormous, incredible=E2= =80=A6 > > > > Perhaps =E2=80=98incredible=E2=80=99 is getting close to =E2=80=98wondrou= s=E2=80=99. So the multivalent > Greek is echoed in the multivalent German. > > > > But are there, *also*, German translations that take the more English, mo= re > purely 'wondrous' view? > > > > Hopefully, today, I=E2=80=99ll have time to read all those references =E2= =80=93 thanks! > > > > Patrick > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:59 PM Laval Hunsucker <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > But then again if one so wishes can't most anything be [ labeled as ] > "awesome" nowadays ? > > - Laval Hunsucker > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:23 PM Ralph Hancock <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > Steven Schuster wrote: > > Very much a side track, but wouldn=E2=80=99t the word =E2=80=9Cawful=E2= =80=9D have presented > translation issues at some periods of its apparent transition of > meaning? > > > The hymn which (when dinosaurs roamed the earth) I used to sing as a > choirboy -- > > Before Jehovah's awful throne > Ye nations bow with sacred joy; > Know that the Lord is God alone, > He can create, and he destroy > > -- has now become 'Before Jehovah's awesome throne ..' which sounds to me > as if the throne were covered in Swarovski crystals. > > RH > > >