Re: PB with auctex-11.54 (debian testing)

David Kastrup <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.auc-tex
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] (Frank Küster) writes:

> David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Daniel Flipo <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specspdl-size"
>>>
> [...]
>> On Fedora Core 3, this was caused by an utterly outdated "Emacspeak"
>> package that shadowed regexp-opt.el with a buggy old file for Emacs-19
>> (!) compatibility purposes.
>>
>> Do you have Emacspeak installed?  And which versions?  The current
>> version would be 21.0.
>
> The newest version in Debian is 17.0, and the maintainer doesn't seem
> interested in the package any more - at least if you judge only from the
> bug page.
>
>> If it turns out that Debian has the same
>> conflict, we should work on the package dependencies for it.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/291970
>
> I was thinking about doing an NMU for this. But since then I have
> discovered a more severe issue of this package:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/292322
>
> The license situation is unclear, and the package might be non-free.
>
> Hm, considering this, I think I should do the NMU anyway. It does
> break auctex (and probably other packages) *now*, but a removal due
> to a bad license might take time; it will take even more time if the
> author promises to clear up the license situation.

Well, it may be necessary to move the package to non-free, but this
does not affect the package itself.  If an update to 21.0 is not
feasible, at least the package should take care not to install
packages into Emacs-21 that are older than what Emacs-21 has.

And the AUCTeX package should list the current Emacspeak package as a
package conflict.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.